The
seventh generation Lancer gains an additional name "Cedia" which
is the combination of "Century" and "Diamond". Sounds a little
bit prestige, at least Mitsubishi is thinking so. This implies
the new Lancer is designed to be more luxurious and conservative
but not as sporty as its predecessor.
Nevertheless,
the boring appearance has certainly nothing in common with
diamond. So conservative that it feels outdated from day one.
Inside the cabin is another matter. The new dash and integrated
center console is quite stylish and made of better quality
plastic, although the wood-grain dashboard in some models looks
tasteless.
Like all
competitors, the Lancer has grown a lot to improve
accommodation. Wheelbase is now stretched by 100 mm to a more
reasonable 2600 mm, or exactly the same as the new Toyota
Corolla. This frees up a massive 60 mm to rear passenger’s
legroom but overall speaking the cabin is still obviously less
spacious than Corolla and Civic. The new chassis gains 50% in
torsional and bending stiffness, in addition to more
sound-insulating foam added to door pillars, noise suppression
is vastly improved.
Unluckily,
Mitsubishi’s GDI engines are not renowned for smoothness and
quietness. A bit more fuel-efficient they may be, but both the
1.5 and 1.8-litre version employed by the Lancer are too loud
and harsh at high rev. To make things worse, the compulsory (for
Japan) Invecs-III CVT always tends to keep the engine running at
high rev and spoil refinement. On the other hand, both engines
are less powerful and willing than Toyota’s VVT-i and Honda’s
VTEC counterparts, generating just 100 hp and 130 hp (plus a
not-so-broad torque curve) from 1.5-litre and 1.8-litre
respectively. I miss the previous 175 hp MIVEC 1.6 very much.
Perhaps Mitsubishi should have put its limited development
budget on variable-valve timing instead of GDI.
Mitsubishi’s
first CVT is another weakness. It may be cheaper than
conventional automatic but it did nothing to solve the
"rubber-band effect" problem found in conventional CVTs. Floor
down the throttle, you’ll hear the engine rev hard but the car
accelerates slowly. Luckily, 1.8-litre version provides an
additional Sport Mode, i.e., Tiptronic-style manual override
which provides 6-predefined ratios. But isn’t it nonsense to buy
a CVT car and always drive it in manual mode to avoid rubber
band effect ?
Again, Lancer
is one of the rare small family cars employing multi-link rear
suspensions. Again, this does not benefit handling and ride at
all, strangely. Although the company claimed some improvements
to the geometry (higher roll center, for instance) and stiffer
control arms, and the chassis is much more rigid, the new Lancer
actually inspires less its driver. It is not a bit involving to
drive - isolated steering feel, too much understeer, no throttle
steer at all. At cornering limit, its steering lightens and
becomes mushy, devoid of any confidence. The old 175 hp MR had
no steering feel too, but at least it could play oversteer and
thrill its driver by the 7,500 rpm engine. In contrast, the most
sporty new Lancer, 1.8 Touring, is of course less harsh on bumpy
road, but it is also not refined enough by today’s standard. A
new Civic will leave it dead in both ride and handling.
Seeing such a
disappointing new car, now we know why Mitsubishi is running
into financial trouble.
|
|
Lancer
Ralliart
Lancer
Ralliart is produced exclusively for the US market. It targets
at the "pocket rocket" segment currently consists of Ford SVT
Focus, Honda Civic Si, Dodge Neon SRT-4, Mazdaspeed Protege
Turbo and Mini Cooper S. Based on the front-drive Lancer sedan
chassis, Mitsubishi reinforced the chassis with front tower
strut, stiffened springs and dampers, retuned power steering and
adopted 16-inch 205/50 tires. According to testers, handling and
ride is surprisingly good, easily being the best front-drive
Mitsubishi. Crisp turn-in, stable cornering and compliant ride
make it a satisfying driver’s car.
Under the bonnet, a larger,
2.4-litre four-cylinder engine is fitted. SOHC driving 4 valves
per cylinder is a low cost solution rather than engineer’s
choice. The once-dead MIVEC cam-changing variable valve timing
and lift mechanism is reborn in this engine, but it is used as a
means of enhancing economy rather than power. At low rev, it
switches to a set of uneven cam profiles that introduces swirl
to the air flow in order to help fuel mixing. That means even
2.4 litres of capacity can generate only 162 horsepower. Ford
Focus, for example, generates 170hp out of 2.0 litres.
Thanks to a rich torque curve,
Lancer Ralliart is brisk enough to drive. It won’t touch the
turbocharged Neon SRT-4 and Protege Turbo, but its extra
capacity allows it to out-pace SVT Focus and Civic Si.
Unfortunately, pocket rockets are not all about speed and
handling. Styling is also an important factor to young buyers.
In this aspect, the Lancer loses marks. The Lancer sedan was
never a pretty car, so adding a new nose and rear spoiler won’t
change that much. Sadly, this car goes much better than it
looks.
|
|
Lancer GSR
Evolution VII
Evo V,
good. Evo VI, better. Tommi Makinen, welcome. Anyway, they were
just small evolutions from the Evo IV because the chassis and
powertrain were basically unchanged. As the Lancer sedan was
renewed in mid-2000, the new Evolution VII also enjoys a new
chassis. In addition to a new active differential, Evo's fans
have more things to talk about than ever.
Let us start from the chassis
first. The regular Lancer Cedia is already far more rigid than
its predecessor, but the Evolution strengthened it further by
adding some 200 spot welds to suspension attachment, sills,
pillars, floorpan etc. - the result is 50% higher torsional
stiffness than the outgoing Evo VI !
For crash protection,
refinement and space reasons the Lancer sedan is also
considerably heavier than before, just like the new Impreza.
However, unlike Subaru, Mitsubishi made extra effort to cut fat
from Evo VII, including using aluminium bonnet and front
fenders, magnesium cam cover (these improve weight distribution
as well), thinner roof panel and glass. Even the Recaro seats
are lighter. They also reviewed the rear wing and decided to
discard its adjustable function. All these works result in just
40 kg increment over Evo VI, which is undoubtedly very good
considering the car is 105 mm longer, 45 mm wider and have a
wheelbase stretched by 115 mm.
The powerplant remains to be
the familiar 2.0-litre turbocharged four named 4G63. Believe or
not, it has been serving Lancer GSR since the first generation !
this latest version is believed to be the last evolution of the
engine and it will be replaced by an all-new GDI unit in Evo
VIII. As it reaches the end of life span, not many things can be
improved. In particular, it is still lack of variable valve
timing or variable intake. Here is the list of minor
improvement: hollow camshafts, smaller turbo nozzle for better
mid-range response, variable back-pressure exhaust for improved
noise and lower back pressure, higher flow intercooler with 1
more water spray injector and at last a bigger oil-cooler. These
small tweaks add 1 kgm (7 lbft) of peak torque while -
officially speaking - peak power remains at the domestic
voluntary limit of 280 hp. I believe the actual figure has
already exceeded 300 hp.
The old Evo VI did 0-60 in 4.4
sec and 0-100 in 11.2 sec. The new car is 40 kg heavier but
deliver slightly more torque, so in terms of straight line
acceleration it is more or less the same as before. However, in
terms of cornering the new car is obviously quicker, thanks to
improved chassis and 4-wheel drive system. It is always more
resistant to understeer. If we define the outgoing car's
cornering limit as 100%, then the new one will be 108%. Someone
lapped a new GSR in Japan's Tsukuba race track in 1 min 6.67
sec, eclipsing Evo VI's 1 min 6.71. Yet this is just in a smooth
and familiar racing circuit. In real world - less predictable
public roads or poorer surfaces - the difference will be
inevitably much bigger.
Now let us talk about the most
interesting part - the drivetrain. While transmission is
virtually the same 5-speeder (sorry, the rumoured 6-speeder did
not come true, giving Impreza STi a clear advantage here), the
center differential is new. All previous Lancer Evo employed a
simple viscous-coupling unit as center LSD, whose disadvantages
are passive and a fair amount of delay (see Technical School).
Calling ACD (Active Center Differential), the new unit is a
multi-plate clutch whose degree of engagement is controlled by
computer via hydraulic according to needs. New concept ? no, it
was pioneered by Porsche 959 and is now using by Audi TT,
Volkswagen Golf 4motion etc. What differs it from other similar
systems is that it cooperates with the existing AYC (Active Yaw
Control) and, I believe, its software is the best developed
among all. Undoubtedly, Mitsubishi's experience and requirements
in World Rally Championship must help a lot the tuning of the
system. By the way, rally cars such as Focus WRC also use active
center differentials.
So
what is the advantage of active differential ? firstly, using
multi-plate clutch instead of viscous liquid speeds up response
by 3 times. Secondly, the torque split between front and rear
axle can be varied many times during cornering to maximize grip
and steering response. Normally the torque split is 50:50. When
entering a corner, ACD will tend to distribute equal amount of
torque to both axle by locking up the clutches in order to
maximize grip and induce a bit understeer - both of them are
vital to stabilize the car. In mid-corner, ACD will tend to
disengage the clutches thus allow more speed difference between
front and rear wheels, which is vital to cornering agility. In
the exit phase ACD will lock up again to equalize pulling force
on all wheels, hence maximize traction to pull the car out of
corner.
Another advantage of ACD is
that it is adaptive to road conditions. Choose "Tarmac" mode and
it will allow more clutch slippage, hence torque transmit freely
from one end to another. "Gravel" mode tends to limit the
difference between front and rear torque split so to minimize
tyre slip. "Snow" mode nearly lock up all wheels to prevent from
any wheel spin.
The last advantage is that it
cooperates with AYC. Remember the active yaw control ? it has
been adopted since Evo IV and is renowned for killing the
understeer character of the car. It is actually a small
multi-plate clutch incorporated inside rear differential. When
the clutches engage, more torque will be sent to the opposite
wheel. In mid-corner, AYC directs more torque to outside rear
wheel to reduce understeer or even induce oversteer as desired.
Exit corner, it transmits more torque to inside rear wheel to
induce understeer for stability. The AYC in new Evo is
unchanged, but it shares the computer and sensors (steering
angle, g-force, yaw, wheel speed etc.) with ACD and communicate
with each other to optimise the result. Think about it, ACD
adjusts torque split between front and rear while AYC takes care
of left and right (rear wheels), so they can virtually control
the torque transmitted to any individual wheel as desired. As
long as the software is right, this is the ultimate drivetrain
engineers dreamed for decades !
On The Road
You will never appreciate its
styling, but honestly speaking I think the (relatively) leaner
look of the new car is far better than the horrible He-man style
of the old one (I don't like He-man, by the way), although few
journalists agree with me. Anyway, if you really care about
styling, you must wait for the forthcoming Focus Cosworth.
In contrast, all people will
agree that the new cockpit is a big improvement. Apart from more
head room and rear passenger leg room, the dashboard also looks
smarter and made of higher quality plastic. Thanks God, the fake
wood found in regular Lancer Cedia is no longer here. Facing the
superb Recaro seats are chromed-rim gauges and a window showing
the manual selection of ACD - "Tarmac", "Gravel" and "Snow".
Interesting enough ?
Twist the key and you'll notice
the engine is silencer - thanks to variable exhaust and better
noise insulation of the stronger body shell. Simultaneously,
you'll find throttle response is sharper than ever once the
turbo is operating. Among all turbo machines, you might need a
911 Turbo to beat its throttle response. For best results from
the engine you still need 3,000 rpm, but the torque curve is
obviously flatter - not only comes earlier but also drops later.
Power band is strongest between 2,750 and 5,500 rpm. Turbo lag
has been reduced a lot, although a single big turbo indicates
that it is not in the league of Audi RS4, that miracle turbo
machine.
Very quick, no doubt, but
anyone having experienced the Evo V upwards won't be scared.
Instead, they will be surprised by the new-found refinement. The
strong chassis and additional suspension travel (15mm front and
10mm rear) result in less thump and bang on rough surfaces. The
steering column transmits less vibration. Noise level is well
down. However, all these are relative. Compare with other sports
sedans - new Impreza STi inclusive - it still rides very hard
thus is not a good companion for long journey.
Although we would have
preferred one more ratio, transmission has a decent shift
quality while it matches the power band very well. It is not as
slick as Subaru STi's 6-speeder, but with shorter throw, true
decisive and meaty feel. Autocar's test editor Stephen Sutcliffe
said qualitatively speaking it is more satisfying than Subaru's
six-speeder but both EVO and a Japanese journalist said it could
be sticky in a hurry. However, there is no room for argument
that the braking is first class. The Brembo brakes are not only
powerful but pedal feel is also superb.
However, the strongest area of
the new Evo is cornering ability. Apart from TVR Tuscan we have
never seen a car with a steering so direct - just 2.0 turns from
lock to lock ! in addition to active yaw control, steering
response is astonishing. At first you might think it is too
nervous, but getting use to it you'll discover it is extremely
precise and well weighted while that directness allows you to
attack corner with the least hands movement yet full confidence.
The result is, we have never seen a car turn-in so
enthusiastically and corner so quickly. The power of ACD and AYC
is really astonishing. They give the car bags of grip yet
virtually no understeer. Best of all, the computer cleverness
does not devoid of driver involvement. You can still adjust
driving angle and line by cooperating throttle and steering and
even plays power slide.
Undoubtedly, Mitsubishi has
succeeded developing the ultimate driving machine in the world.
It is the quickest A-to-B car ever made. Best of all, it remains
to be a bargain. Subaru Impreza STi is thoroughly knocked out.
|
|
From Evolution I to VI
Since the first Lancer
Evolution arrived in 1992, it kept updating nearly every year.
The Evolution I was already a spectacular car, with the 4G63
turbocharged 16 valves straight four engine pumping out 250hp,
4-wheel-drive, aluminium bonnet, close ratio gearbox, Recaro
sports seats and Momo steering wheels...
Evo II launched in late 1993,
had little modifications, the most important of which is the
increment of ride height to provide more suspensions travel. The
engine got 10 extra horsepower.
Evo III in Jan 95 introduced a
set of awesome aerodynamic kits, including big front bumper and
bi-plane rear wing. Intercooler was enlarged while power raised
to 270hp.
Evo IV of summer 96 was based
on the body of the new generation Lancer sedan. Apart from the
stronger chassis, a lot effort was made to the engine and drive
train. Racing camshaft, improved induction and exhaust added 10
hp and more important, 33 lbft of torque. Helical mechanical
rear LSD was used while the AYC Automatic Yaw Control made its
debut.
Evo V of Jan 98 was also
another great improvement. Front and rear track received a
generous increment of 40 and 35mm respectively. Wider wheel
arches accommodate the 225mm wide, 17in diameter sports tyres.
Superior brakes incorporated Brembo calipers with 4 pistons in
front and 2 in rear. Suspensions arms made of aluminium alloy.
Inverted dampers improved chassis rigidity. A new turbocharger
and improved intercooler brought peak torque to 275lbft from
261lbft, while the 280hp power was bounded by domestic
regulation. An improved AYC reduced the understeer found in
previous generations so that many people started to choose the
Lancer instead of Subaru Impreza WRX.
Evo VI of Jan 99 improved
mostly in aerodynamics reacted to the change of WRC's
regulation, plus improved engine cooling making the same power
and torque more durable. RS version introduced the world's first
titanium turbine to reduce turbo lag. Extra spot welds improved
chassis rigidity.
Late 99 introduced Tommi
Makinen edition of Evo VI as a celebration to the driver's 4th
consecutive WRC title with Mitsubishi. Cosmetic changes aside,
there are some minor tweaks - ride height dropped 10mm
(therefore ride even harsher), revised Titanium turbine to
improve response, more engine cooling, larger exhaust diameter
and improved oil pant.
|
Evo I
|
Evo II
|
Evo III
|
Evo IV
|
Evo V
|
Evo VI
|
Year
|
Sep 92
|
Dec 93
|
Jan 95
|
Aug 96
|
98 Jan
|
99 Jan
|
No. produced
|
5000
|
5000
|
7000
|
12000
|
6000
|
5000
|
Length
|
4310mm
|
4330mm
|
4350mm
|
Width
|
1695mm
|
1690mm
|
1770mm
|
Height
|
1395mm
|
1420mm
|
1415mm
|
Wheelbase
|
2500mm
|
2510mm
|
Weight
|
1240kg
|
1250kg
|
1260kg
|
1350kg
|
1360kg
|
1360kg
|
Power
|
250hp
|
260hp
|
270hp
|
280hp
|
280hp
|
280hp
|
Torque
|
228lbft
|
228lbft
|
228lbft
|
261lbft
|
275lbft
|
275lbft
|
Tyres
|
195/55R15
|
205/55R16
|
225/45ZR17
|
|
|
Evo VII GT-A
GT-A
can be described as "gentlemen’s Lancer Evolution". It is
slightly less powerful, heavier and slower than the regular GSR,
but with automatic transmission, softer suspensions and better
NVH suppression to please those less-hardcore customers.
The biggest change is the use
of Invecs-II 5-speed automatic transmission instead of the
5-speed manual. The Tiptronic-style gearbox has button-shift
controls at the steering wheel. In normal use it shifts
smoothly, if not quickly. Manual mode does not improve response,
making it less satisfying to drive than the GSR.
The turbocharger uses smaller
turbine and nozzle to reduce turbo lag and improve drivability.
This drop horsepower from 280 to 272hp and reduce torque from
282 to 253lbft. Taking into account the torque converter and
80kg of weight penalty, you can see 0-60 is closer to 6 rather
than 5 seconds.
The
exterior of GT-A is less aggressive than GSR. To achieve a
"gentleman’s look" it even sacrifices some functional designs,
such as the cooling outlets on the bonnet. This will inevitably
limit the durability of the turbocharged engine under hard use -
a thing less important for the GT-A. Similarly, the number plate
has been relocated from side to middle of the nose to refine the
look. This block part of the air flow to the intercooler.
Another downgrade is the rear spoiler, which has been replaced
by a small one. The adjustable big spoiler is only available as
option. Alternatively, if buyers want their cars looking like
"wolf in sheep clothes", they can have no rear spoiler too.
The chassis is added with more
sound insulation and reinforcement to reduce vibration and
harshness. The ultra-quick steering rack has been toned down.
Suspensions are tuned softer to deliver better, if not truly
comfortable, ride. Nevertheless, as ride height and low-profile
tyres remain unchanged, low-speed ride remains harsh, although
high-speed ride does improve.
Very disappointing. Mitsubishi
has created something neither exciting nor comfortable. We would
have liked to see a mini Galant VR4, but unfortunately Lancer GT-A
is not such car. It is also over-priced. Mitsubishi UK offers it
at £31,500. For less than £30,000, you can have an Alfa Romeo
156 GTA with Selespeed, which is definitely the more attractive
GTA here.
|
|
EvoVII Extreme
The Extreme is a hotter version
of Evo VII modified by Mitsubishi's official tuning arm Ralliart
UK. It is not a stripped-out version as it has all the standard
equipment such as air-con, CD player, ABS etc. as the standard
Evo VII GSR. However, a re-chipped management program pushes
maximum turbo boost to 1.6 bar, accompany with forged pistons
and con-rods, larger intercooler as well as bigger bore exhaust,
the maximum power is raised from the standard (if quite
self-limiting) 280hp to 340hp. That might not impress you, but
like rallying cars, torque is the most improved area - now it
has 350 lbft instead of 282 lbft.
The gearbox is unchanged, but
clutch is 25% stronger to cope with increased torque from the
engine. Most astonishing are brakes - the front has a AP 6-pot
caliper clamping 362mm-diameter, cross-drilled ventilated disc !
other modifications are much more predictable, such as stiffened
suspensions, 20mm lower ride height, larger 18in wheels wearing
lower-profile Yokohama AVS rubbers. The wheels are made of
magnesium to cut weight, so the Extreme - despite of all the
strengthened powertrain and brakes - weighs the same as the
standard GSR.
The Extreme does 0-60 in 4.2
seconds, which means it can compete with a Porsche 911 Turbo
until three figures. The 0-100 time of 11.0 seconds already
reflects the fact that its down-force-based aerodynamics is not
designed for Autobahn. This is further confirmed by the 160mph
top speed. However, at what we called "real world speed" the
Lancer Extreme is nearly unbeatable, especially its combination
of 4WD, ACD and AYC provides unmatchable grip and accuracy in
any roads, including the worst bumpy and twisty roads. The
explosive power is well under controlled by the superb chassis.
It combines the best of two worlds - TVR's explosiveness and
911's security. And Lancer's practicality too. Despite of harder
ride, the Extreme is not as difficult to live with as you might
expect from the name.
|
|
Evo VIII
Finally,
Evolution VIII is understood to be the last evolution of the hot
Lancer. From 2005, its status as a WRC rally car will be
substituted by the smaller Mirage / Colt hatchback. Perhaps the
Lancer has got too big and heavy during all those years.
As it is the last generation,
Mitsubishi didn’t invest too much into it. Insiders said it is
actually an Evo 7.5, just like the Tommi Makinen version being
Evo 6.5. Compare with last generation, Evo VIII has a list of
long but rather insignificant improvements. Externally, you can
easily see it has adopted a new company grille, whose generic
shape does not suit the rest of the car. The nose is also
extended forward by about 40mm to reserve a space for an
anti-intrusion bar required by the US regulations, although the
domestic and European version does not have that anti-intrusion
bar installed. Additional holes in the front bumper added 10%
cooling to the intercooler.
The intercooler itself is also
enlarged. In addition to modified exhaust and a more efficient
turbocharger, the 4G63 engine now generates 289 lbft of torque
at 3500rpm, an increase of 7lbft. Mid-band torque curve (between
3000 and 5000rpm) is also improved. Officially, power remains at
the self-regulated 280hp, but engineers revealed that it is
actually closer to 310hp.
The Evo VIII weighs 10kg more
than last generation, quite impressive considering the longer
nose and the strengthened bodyshell. In fact, Mitsubishi worked
hard to save weight from other places - 2.5kg from engine, 3.2
kg from new wheels, even the big rear spoiler is now made of
carbon fiber.
10
more kg and 7 more pound-feet would have meant unchanged
performance, but here is the real breakthrough: the Evo VIII
employs a new 6-speed manual gearbox, replacing the long-serving
5-speeder. This is the company’s first all-new gearbox in a
decade. Its shifts as quick and precise as the old 5-speed unit,
with the benefit of closer ratio and therefore higher
performance. According to official figures, 0-60mph now cuts to
4.6 seconds. The performance gain is marginal, but tell me what
else at this price can offer sub-5-second 0-60 and sit 4 people?
the Japanese rally cars are still unmatched by European
challengers.
In the chassis side, ACD active
center differential continues to serve the car to provide
massive grip and adjustable torque split according to driver’s
choice. AYC active yaw control has been upgraded to Super AYC,
using planetary gear instead of bevel gears to double the amount
of torque transfer allowed between rear wheels.
The result? road testers found
the Evo VIII corners even quicker than Evo VII. Steering is even
shaper, without understeer even at cornering limit. This is also
the biggest advantage over Subaru Impreza STi and Prodrive. On
the other hand, the suspensions are slightly softer thus ride is
a little quieter and more compliant than the old car, although
"harsh" is still the most suitable adjective.
|
|
Evolution (US version)
While Mitsubishi plans to sell
just 5,000 units of Evo VIII in Japan during its whole life, it
expect to shift as many as 6,500 units to the USA in the first
year. To achieve the higher volume, cost reduction is inevitably
necessary. Therefore the expensive ACD active differential has
gone, replaced with a cheap viscous-coupling (which transfer
torque passively once slip occurs). AYC active yaw control is
also substituted by a conventional mechanical LSD. There are no
6-speed gearbox. It still employs the old 5-speeder from Evo
VII. Luckily, Brembo brakes are retained.
LEV emission regulation
requires the turbocharged engine to be detuned to just 271 hp
and 273 lbft. Worse still is that the car weighs 70kg more than
the supposedly more complicated Japanese version, mostly due to
the anti-intrusion bar at the nose as required by safety
regulations. The car is therefore slower than the Japanese
version.
So, once again American has to
put up with an inferior car than the rest of the world has. It
even lost the magic number "VIII" - because the first 7
incarnations were never sold there, Mitsubishi US simply calls
this car as Lancer Evolution.
|
|
Specifications
Model
|
Lancer 1.5
MX
|
Lancer 1.8
Touring
|
Lancer
Ralliart
|
Layout
|
Front-engined, Fwd
|
Front-engined, Fwd
|
Front-engined, Fwd
|
L / W / H / WB (mm)
|
4360 / 1695 / 1430 / 2600
|
4360 / 1695 / 1430 / 2600
|
?
|
Engine
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl,
DI.
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl,
DI.
|
Inline-4, sohc, 4v/cyl, VVT
|
Capacity
|
1468 cc
|
1834 cc
|
2378 cc
|
Power
|
100 hp
|
130 hp
|
162 hp
|
Torque
|
101 lbft
|
130 lbft
|
162 lbft
|
Transmission
|
CVT
|
CVT
|
5M
|
Suspensions (F/R)
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Tyres (F/R)
|
All: 175/70 R14
|
All: 195/55 R15
|
All: 205/50 VR16
|
Weight
|
1130 kg
|
1190 kg
|
1300 kg
|
Top speed
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
0-60 mph
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.7 (est)
|
0-100 mph
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Model
|
Lancer GSR
Evo VII
|
Lancer Evo
VII GT-A
|
Lancer Evo
VII Extreme
|
Layout
|
Front-engined, 4wd.
|
Front-engined, 4wd.
|
Front-engined, 4wd.
|
L / W / H / WB (mm)
|
4455 / 1770 / 1450 / 2625
|
4455 / 1770 / 1450 / 2625
|
4455 / 1770 / 1430 / 2625
|
Engine
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo.
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo.
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo.
|
Capacity
|
1997 c.c.
|
1997 c.c.
|
1997 c.c.
|
Power
|
280 hp
|
272 hp
|
340 hp
|
Torque
|
282 lbft
|
253 lbft
|
350 lbft
|
Transmission
|
5M
|
5A with manual mode
|
5M
|
Suspensions (F/R)
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Tyres (F/R)
|
All: 235/45 ZR17
|
All: 235/45 ZR17
|
All: 235/40 ZR18
|
Weight
|
1400 kg
|
1480 kg
|
1402 kg
|
Top speed
|
153 mph*
|
150 mph (estimated)
|
159 mph*
|
0-60 mph
|
4.7 sec*
|
6.0 sec (estimated)
|
4.2 sec*
|
0-100 mph
|
12.7 sec*
|
N/A
|
11.0 sec*
|
Model
|
Lancer GSR
Evo VIII
|
Lancer
Evolution (US)
|
-
|
Layout
|
Front-engined, 4wd
|
Front-engined, 4wd
|
-
|
L / W / H / WB (mm)
|
4490 / 1770 / 1450 / 2625
|
4490 / 1770 / 1450 / 2625
|
-
|
Engine
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo.
|
Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo.
|
-
|
Capacity
|
1997 cc
|
1997 cc
|
-
|
Power
|
280 hp
|
271 hp
|
-
|
Torque
|
289 lbft
|
273 lbft
|
-
|
Transmission
|
6M
|
5M
|
-
|
Suspension (F/R)
|
Strut / multi-link
|
Strut / multi-link
|
-
|
Tyres (F/R)
|
All: 235/45 ZR17
|
All: 235/45 ZR17
|
-
|
Weight
|
1410 kg
|
1480 kg
|
-
|
Top speed
|
155 mph (est)
|
152 mph (est)
|
-
|
0-60 mph
|
4.8 sec*
|
5.1 sec**
|
-
|
0-100 mph
|
12.7 sec*
|
13.4 sec**
|
-
|
Article source
Autozine.net
|